Categories
Ancestral Stories

Ancestral Stories #9

Katherine de Roet

My 20 x Great Grandmother

Katherine’s Upbringing

My 20 x great grandmother Katherine de Roet was born c1349. The chronicler Jean Froissart noted that Katherine was raised in Hainaut, a province in Belgium. In 1351, her father, Paon de Roet, was in the service of Margaret II, Countess of Hainaut, and caught up in a family civil war. Katherine and Paon were also caught up in the Bubonic Plague, which was sweeping across Europe.

In 1351, Margaret II’s second son, William, captured Hainaut, so Margaret and her supporters, including Paon de Roet, fled to England in the hope of securing safety, and to enlist the support of Margaret’s brother-in-law King Edward III of England. Baby Katherine travelled to England with her father.

A peace deal between Margaret II and her son William was brokered. Margaret II, Paon de Roet, and other members of the royal retinue returned to Hainault. However, Katherine remained in England because her family was in the service of Edward the Black Prince, the eldest son and heir of King Edward III and Queen Philippa of Hainaut. Through this connection, Katherine spent her childhood at the royal courts.

My connection to Katherine de Roet through the Stradling and Beaufort branches of my family. Graphic: Wikitree

My medieval ancestor Katherine de Roet’s father, Paon de Roet, died c1355. Her mother does not appear in the historical record and it’s probable that she also died around that date (the Bubonic Plague was rampant).

Katherine spent her childhood in the royal courts of King Edward III and his wife Queen Philippa of Hainaut. The older children of King Edward III and Queen Philippa were much older than Katherine, so she spent her time with their younger children, Mary and Margaret, and her nurse, Agnes Bonsergent.

The chronicler Jean Froissart noted that Katherine’s tutor in her youth was Blanche of Lancaster, a close relative of the King and the bride of his third surviving son, John of Gaunt. At the same time, Blanche herself, eight years older than Katherine, was brought up by Queen Philippa. Consequently, a close friendship developed between Katherine and Blanche of Lancaster.

The Marriage of John of Gaunt and Blanche of Lancaster in Reading Abbey on 19 May 1359 by Horace Wright (1914).

My ancestor Katherine de Roet’s guardian was Queen Philippa of Hainault (pictured), a “noble and kind woman”, who at that time, 1355, was over forty years old, and the mother of twelve children. 

Queen Philippa enjoyed an interest in art and literature, and engaged in charity work. Chroniclers noted that she was “generous, kind, wise and humbly pious”, qualities that she imbued in Katherine.

Along with Dutch and Norman-French, Katherine also spoke English. She was literate, and developed into a skilled horsewoman. She learned the etiquette and diplomacy of the royal court. Not yet a teenager, she was wise beyond her years.

My ancestor Katherine de Roet received an excellent education at the royal English courts. She was literate, fluent in a number of languages, and a skilled horsewoman. 

Although by origin Katherine did not belong to the highest nobility, her upbringing at the royal courts placed her at the centre of the political and social spectrum. She learned the art of diplomacy, the benefits of piety, and house management skills, lessons she took on board.

The chronicler Jean Froissart reported that Katherine from her youth “knew court etiquette perfectly”. Furthermore, she became acquainted with the dashing John of Gaunt (pictured), keeping a dozen horses at his stables, and accompanying him on horse rides throughout his estates. An attraction developed between the couple. However, they were from different social backgrounds, and therefore forbidden to marry.

No known portrait of my medieval ancestor Katherine de Roet exists, although some scholars believe she features in this picture, an image of Geoffrey Chaucer reciting Troylus and Criseyde to the royal court.

From fragments, Katherine has been described as fair-haired and buxom, perfectly built with a narrow waist and wide hips. She had a long neck, a round face and a high forehead, and was “extraordinarily beautiful and feminine”.

Book News

My latest translation, the Greek version of Betrayal, Ann’s War Mystery Series, book one.

As ever, thank you for your interest and support.

Hannah xxx

For Authors

#1 for value with 565,000 readers, The Fussy Librarian has helped my books to reach #1 on 40 occasions.

A special offer from my publisher and the Fussy Librarian. https://authors.thefussylibrarian.com/?ref=goylake

Don’t forget to use the code goylake20 to claim your discount 🙂

Categories
Movies ‘48

Movies ‘48 #5

Movie News – January 29, 1948

Loretta Young’s comments, featured on 27 January about the British people starving and shivering, were criticised by a British tourist official.

Movie News – January 30, 1948

Films showing this week in British cinemas: You Can’t Have Everything starring Alice Faye, The Falcon in Hollywood starring Tom Conway, and Great Expectations starring John Mills.

Movie News – January 31, 1948

Bette Davis and her husband, William Grant Sherry. The couple divorced in 1950. Maybe Bette’s expression offered a hint of what was to follow…

Movie News – February 1, 1948

A film famine in Britain – no new shows this week.

Movie News – February 2, 1948

Joe E Howard (pictured), the composer of over 500 popular songs, including I Wonder Who’s Kissing Her Now, was injured when a car struck him while he was crossing a street in Hollywood. While in hospital, recovering from concussion, he sang some of his hits to the nurses, including I Wonder Who’s Kissing Her Now.

A footnote to this story. Harold Orlob sued Joe E Howard, claiming that he had penned I Wonder Who’s Kissing Her Now. Orlob won his suit. He sought no compensation, but asked that he should be recognised as the primary composer of the song.

Movie News – February 3, 1948

Beauty Spurns the Films

Miss America of 1947, brunette, beautiful Barbara Jo Walker, has now turned down fifteen offers to go to Hollywood. Barbara explained: “I have my ideals. I want to be the wife of a successful doctor.” Her wish was granted when her sweetheart, John Hummel, received his medical degree.

Footnote: Barbara Jo Walker was the last Miss America to be crowned in her bathing suit; all since 1947 have been crowned in their evening gowns. Her son, Andy Hummel, was a member of the power pop band Big Star.

Movie News – February 4, 1948

“Daughter of Darkness is a Jack the Ripper story in reverse. The heroine seduces then murders husky young men. A startling performance from Siobhan McKenna, who gives this monstrous young woman just the right proportion of chill and seduction. Outrageous nonsense, but never dull.”

*****

A culturally important movie, Storm Center starring Bette Davis was released in 1956. A noir drama directed by Daniel Taradash, the story focused on three controversial subjects – book banning, censorship and McCarthyism. Storm Center was the first overtly anti-McCarthyism film to be produced in Hollywood.

My research for Eve’s War, Heroines of SOE, and my Golden Age of Hollywood novels, has produced the following coincidence: I selected female SOE agents to research and actresses Blacklisted in the 1950s. Most of my selections, including Marsha Hunt, lived well into their nineties. I wasn’t aware of this before selecting them for research. Marsha Hunt actually lived to be 104. A theory: their fighting qualities aided their longevity.

My latest Golden Age of Hollywood article for the Seaside News appears on page 43 of the magazine

As ever, thank you for your interest and support.

Hannah xxx

For Authors

#1 for value with 565,000 readers, The Fussy Librarian has helped my books to reach #1 on 40 occasions.

A special offer from my publisher and the Fussy Librarian. https://authors.thefussylibrarian.com/?ref=goylake

Don’t forget to use the code goylake20 to claim your discount 🙂

Categories
Ancestral Stories

Ancestral Stories #8

Sarah Wildsmith

My 7 x Great Grandmother

Sarah and Gregory

My ancestor Sarah Wildsmith entered her thirties as a widow. She’d married at nineteen, but her husband, Philip Spooner, had languished in the debtor’s prison and died there. Could Sarah rebuild her life? Could she find a new husband?

In 1731, a new man, literally, rode into town. His name: Gregory Wright. Gregory was a gentleman with a high reputation, the White Knight of the neighbourhood. He rode and tended to horses. He also ran a coaching business, transporting the citizens of London in his fine carriages. 

Gregory was Sarah’s age, thirty-one. Furthermore, he was an eligible bachelor. Gregory’s coaches ferried wedding parties. Dare Sarah dream that she could become his bride?

On 6 November 1731, my ancestor Sarah Wildsmith, as Sarah Spooner widow, married gentleman, coachman and bachelor Gregory Wright. Both bride and groom were thirty-one. The marriage was a “Clandestine Marriage”, a private affair held in the environs of the ‘Mint and Mayfair Chapel’.

After weathering natural and emotional storms during the first thirty years of her life, as the wife of a prosperous and respected gentleman, Sarah could look forward to sunnier days, and the prospect of raising a family.

While my ancestor Sarah Wildsmith settled into married life with her gentleman husband Gregory Wright, the world developed around her. In 1733 the invention of the flying shuttle revolutionised weaving, and in the same year the Sugar and Molasses Act was passed to tax British colonists in North America.

In 1739-40 the weather was extreme again with a Great Frost in Britain. Also, relevant to Gregory and his coaching business, the Hawkhurst smugglers were active in the south east of England, and highwayman Dick Turpin was hanged in 1738.

On 2 September 1737 Sarah and Gregory baptised a daughter, Mary, in St Dunstan in the West, London. Then, on 7 June 1739 Sarah gave birth to William, my 6 x great grandfather. William was baptised on 8 July 1739, also in St Dunstan in the West, London. In time, William would learn from his father and join him in the family’s coaching business.

On 22 February 1752 my 7 x great grandfather Gregory Wright appeared at the London Sessions in the Old Bailey, as a witness. There, Gregory gave the following evidence.

‘Gregory Wright on his Oath Saith That On or about the Fourteenth of January Instant Two Coach Door Glasses was discovered to be Stolen out of a Coach House at the Bell and Tunn Inn, Fleet Street. Aforesaid the property of William Chamberlain, esq.’

In the court proceedings, Gregory Wright was described as a stable-keeper and coach-master living at Temple-Muse, Fleet Street, White Fryars in London.

The report continued that the thief, John Knight, tried to sell the coach glasses for twenty shillings, approximately £120 in today’s money. Knight, one of Gregory’s servants, was found guilty and sentenced to transportation.

***

A second trial, for perjury, took place on 8 April 1752 at the Old Bailey. Trials in those days were usually brief affairs, over in a matter of minutes. However, this trial received a number of witnesses and ran for some time. Details from the Old Bailey website https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/

‘Thomas Ashley, was indicted for wilful and corrupt perjury on the trial of Joseph Goddard in swearing he met Simons the Jew near Brentford-turnpike, and asked him to drink a pint of beer, that he then took hold of his beard in a joke, that the Jew held up his staff and struck him, that after that he throw’d the Jew in a ditch and scratched him in the bushes, and flung a stone which fell on his head and broke it three weeks before, Sept. 11.’

Henry Simons gave evidence through an interpreter and insisted that no one had harmed him, therefore suggesting that Thomas Ashley had committed perjury at Joseph Goddard’s trial. In his evidence, Henry Simons mentioned the Rose and Crown, an inn later owned by my Brereton ancestors.

Lettice Sergeant also gave evidence and mentioned the Rose and Crown, ‘on this side of the turnpike on Smallbury-green’. She lodged there ‘from the latter end of April to Michaelmas Day.’ She stated that Ashley was drunk, that insults were offered, but that no violence took place.

Gregory Wright gave evidence. He stated, ‘I live at the Temple-Muse, Fleet-street, White Fryars, on the 21st of August last, I set out from my house after one o’clock, for Newberry-Fair by myself, till I came on the other side Hammersmith, there Mr. Pain and Mr. Mercer overtook me; we lay at Maidenhead that night; we continued in company till we came to Newberry; upon out going between the Coach and Horses, on the other side Brentford, and the Rose and Crown Alehouse, before we came at the Turnpike, I saw one man pursuing another; we might be about two hundred yards from the Rose and Crown Alehouse; I saw it was a Foreigner by his dress, that was pursued, which made me anxious to enquire what was the matter; the man behind called out stop Thief! stop Thief! which I believe to be the prisoner at the bar; when the Jew got to us, he got between Mr. Pain’s horse and mine; the drunken man, the pursuer, scrambled up near, we kept him back, the drunken man said he is a rogue and a villain; we desired he’d tell us what he had done; he said he has drank my beer and ran away, and would not pay for it; said I if that he all, let the poor man go about his business, and what is to pay, I’ll pay it; no said he, he would not, and made a scuffle to come at the Jew; I took particular notice of the Jew, he made signs holding his hand up to his beard, we said he should desist; then he (Ashley) said to me, you have robbed me, said I if this is the case you are a villain, and if you say so again I’ll horse-whip you; we stopped him there till the Jew got near to the houses at Brentford; he was very near turning the corner where the bridge is; I believe on my oath, the Jew was at least two-hundred yards off; I turned myself on my horse, half britch, to see whether he was secure, the drunken man swore and cursed, and used many bad words; there came a woman and took hold on him, she seem’d to be his wife, she desired him to go back: he fell down, then Mr. Pain said, the man (Simons) is safe enough; the last woman that gave evidence told me nothing was the matter, that the Jew did nothing to him, he had drank none of his beer, but refused it, and that he made an attempt to pull him by the beard, with that we advanced towards the Crown Alehouse, I, and I believe Mr. Pain, stopt with me; there was the woman that was examined first, I asked her what was the matter, she said no thing at all; I said if there is anything to pay for beer that that poor Jew has drank, I am ready to pay for it; she said the Jew did no harm to the man, nor drank none of his beer.’

Question: ‘Had there been a stone throw’d?’

Gregory Wright: ‘I saw none throw’d, and believe the man was so drunk that he was not able to pursue or over-take him: I saw the woman at the door the time they were running, they crossed the road backwards and forwards; the Jew kept, it may be, fifteen or twenty yards before him, I kept my eye upon them from the first of the calling out stop thief!’

On his cross examination Gregory Wright said, ‘When we first heard the alarm, we believed the Jew might be within fifty yards of the alehouse, and the others about two-hundred yards from the Rose and Crown alehouse; that they were nearer that than the Coach and Horses; that they met the Jew about two-hundred yards on this side of the Rose and Crown alehouse; that we saw no blood or mark at all on the Jew, that he made no such complaint or sign to his head, but said my beard, and sign’d to it.’

Other witnesses agreed that although the mood was threatening no violence took place and that on the whole the community were protective of Henry Simons.

Question to Mr. Wright again. ‘How came you to know of this trial to give your evidence?’

Gregory Wright. ‘I was waiting at the door of the grand jury last sessions, to find a bill against a person (the stolen coach glasses); as I was leaning over the rails, I heard Lettice Sergeant talking about the affair of this Jew; the Jew I observed looked me out of countenance; I asked his interpreter what he look’d at me so hard for, he said he believed he knew me. The woman said she was come to support the cause of this poor unhappy man, and added, that in August last there were four gentlemen coming on the road when he was pursued, and he has made all the enquirey he can to find them out, and can’t find any of them; said I what time in August? she said the 21st; I look’d at the Jew, and saw he was the same man; I ask’d his interpreter whether he was pursued by any man, he said yes, he was; I said to the woman, I know the men, by which means I was brought to the grand jury about this affair; this bill and mine were in together.’

Question to Mr. Wright. ‘Did you, or any of you, tell this witness the drunken man had thrown the Jew into the ditch?’

Gregory Wright: ‘When this witness said so, it gave me a shock: we neither of us told him so. I saw Ashley down: there were none but women at that man’s house when we came there.’

Other witnesses, including thirteen-year-old Edward Beacham supported the testimony offered by Gregory Wright, while Martha James stated that Thomas Ashley was drunk, and that ‘I never saw a man so drunk in my life.’

Verdict: Guilty.

Sentence: Thomas Ashley, to stand once in the pillory at the gate of the Sessions House for the space of one hour, between the hours of twelve and one, and imprison’d during twelve months, after which to be transported for seven years.

This trial offers an insight into the local community, the legal system and Gregory’s character. He was protective of Henry Simons and was willing to meet any expense incurred by Simons at the inn. Gregory was obviously a kind and principled man; an ancestor to be proud of.

My ancestor Sarah Wildsmith died on 8 November 1759. Her husband Gregory Wright survived her by twenty-eight years, but did not remarry.

Sarah and Gregory were held in high esteem by their community, a fact illustrated by Sarah’s burial place. She was granted the privilege of being buried in the central aisle of the church, St Bride’s, Fleet Street (pictured, Wikipedia).

As ever, thank you for your interest and support.

Hannah xxx

For Authors

#1 for value with 565,000 readers, The Fussy Librarian has helped my books to reach #1 on 40 occasions.

A special offer from my publisher and the Fussy Librarian. https://authors.thefussylibrarian.com/?ref=goylake

Don’t forget to use the code goylake20 to claim your discount 🙂

Categories
Movies ‘48

Movies ‘48 #4

Movie News – January 22, 1948

Did you used to visit Saturday morning film clubs? What did you think of them?

Movie News – January 23, 1948

In a fire sequence for Secret Beyond the Door, Michael Redgrave refused to have a double. In the escape scene, blinded by smoke, the star hit the wrong window and ran into glass instead of the sugar product used for such occasions. While having his wounds treated, Redgrave said, “That’s the first British blood split in America since 1812!”

Movie News – January 24, 1948

Coming soon, Raymond Chandler’s The Lady in the Lake starring Robert Montgomery, Lloyd Nolan, Tom Tully and Audrey Totter (pictured), one of the fastest-rising stars in Hollywood. “She provides romance and excitement in a district and positive manner that sets her apart from the usual young screen player”.

The movie was unusual in that it was filmed in a first person, point of view style, with Marlowe only seen in reflections and when he directly addresses the audience.

Movie News – January 25, 1948

Patricia Roc (pictured) tells how new film faces are found.

“If an actress shows promise, the publicity department take her over. They decide on the best personality angle to project through stills and write-ups. Her rise to fame has begun. The real work begins with the starlet’s first big part. She is coached both on and off the set. She learns how to handle autograph sessions and buy clothes. She is given a reasonable contract.”

Movie News – January 26, 1948

Ex-Actress Sues Surgeon

Dr Franklyn Thorpe, Hollywood surgeon and former husband of actress Mary Astor, has filed an answer in the Los Angles Supreme Court denying charges made by former actress Anne Nagel (pictured) that she had been sterilised in an operation he performed in 1936.

He admitted performing an appendectomy with her specific consent, but denied other allegations in her $350,000 damage suit.

Movie News – January 27, 1948

Loretta Young’s Aid Britain Campaign

Loretta Young was a divisive figure in the Hollywood community. On the one hand, she presented herself as pious, and devoted a lot of her time to charity work, while on the other hand, aspects of her personal life and political views raised eyebrows. To some people she was known as “Attila the Nun”.

Movie News – January 28, 1948

An advertisement for Gay Red lipstick. The advertisement failed to mention that Mrs Alan Ladd was Sue Carol born Evelyn Jean Lederer, October 30, 1906 – February 4, 1982). After a spell as an actress, Sue became an agent. The fourth of her four marriages was to Alan Ladd, previously a client. The marriage lasted until his death in 1964.

As ever, thank you for your interest and support.

Hannah xxx

For Authors

#1 for value with 565,000 readers, The Fussy Librarian has helped my books to reach #1 on 40 occasions.

A special offer from my publisher and the Fussy Librarian. https://authors.thefussylibrarian.com/?ref=goylake

Don’t forget to use the code goylake20 to claim your discount 🙂

Categories
Ancestral Stories

Ancestral Stories #7

Sarah Wildsmith

My 7 x Great Grandmother

Sarah’s Marriage to Philip Spooner

On 23 October 1719 my ancestor nineteen-year-old Sarah Wildsmith of St James’, London married twenty-four-year-old Philip Spooner, also of St James’. Sarah was from a respectable, well-to-do family, while Philip was a gentleman and a businessman. However, an air of mystery surrounded the marriage for it was a Clandestine Marriage (pictured). Why did the couple marry in such a secretive fashion?

On 23 October 1719, my ancestor Sarah Wildsmith married gentleman Philip Spooner in a Clandestine Marriage. Clandestine or Fleet Marriages took place in England before the Marriage Act of 1753. Specifically, they were marriages that took place in London’s Fleet Prison or its environs.

By the 1740s up to 6,000 marriages a year were taking place in the Fleet area, compared with 47,000 marriages in England as a whole. One estimate suggests that there were between 70 and 100 clergymen working in the Fleet area between 1700 and 1753. The social status of the couples varied. Some were criminals, others were poor. Some were wealthy while many simply sought a quick or secret marriage for numerous personal reasons.

Sarah and Philip’s marriage was recorded in the ‘Registers of Clandestine Marriages and of Baptisms in the Fleet Prison, King’s Bench Prison, the Mint and the Mayfair Chapel.’ But why did Sarah and Philip marry here? Did they wish to marry in secret, or was one of them a criminal?

The South Sea Company was a British joint-stock company founded in January 1711. Initially, the company’s stock rose in value as it expanded its operations dealing in government debt. Then, in 1720, the company collapsed. The South Sea Bubble burst sending many investors into debt. Among them was Philip Spooner, recently married to my ancestor Sarah Wildsmith. Instead of enjoying a prolonged honeymoon, Philip found himself in the debtor’s prison, and Sarah found herself a wife in name only.

Tree caricature from Bubble Cards

In 1720, after the South Sea investment bubble burst, Philip Spooner, husband of my ancestor Sarah Wildsmith, found himself in the debtor’s prison.

Debtor’s prisons were a common way to deal with unpaid debts. Destitute people who could not pay a court-ordered judgment were incarcerated in these prisons until they had worked off their debt or secured outside funds to pay the balance. 

In England, during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, 10,000 people were imprisoned for debt each year. However, a prison term did not alleviate a person’s debt; an inmate was typically required to repay the creditor in full before their release.

In England and Wales debtors’ prisons varied in the amount of freedom they allowed the debtor. Through his family’s financial support a debtor could pay for certain freedoms; some prisons allowed inmates to conduct business and to receive visitors while others even allowed inmates to live a short distance outside the prison, a practice known as the ‘Liberty of the Rules.’ However, some people spent thirty years or more in prison. 

Unable to raise sufficient funds to cover his debt, Philip faced a bleak future. Sarah, meanwhile, could only rely on her parents and live in hope.

An inmate in a debtor’s prison

My ancestor, Sarah Wildsmith, faced life alone while her husband, Philip Spooner, languished in a debtor’s prison. Along with the embarrassment for the family, life in these prisons was unpleasant. Often, single cells were occupied by a mixture of gentlemen, violent criminals and labourers down on their luck. Conditions were unsanitary and disease was rife.

Many notable people found themselves in a debtor’s prison including Charles Dickens’ father, John. Later, Dickens became an advocate for debt prison reform, and his novel Little Dorrit dealt directly with this issue.

In 1729, Philip died, probably from gaol fever contracted at the prison. Gaol fever was common in English prisons. These days, we believe it was a form of typhus. The disease spread in dark, dirty rooms where prisoners were crowded together allowing lice to infest easily.

Alone, and in financial difficulties, Sarah had to regroup and rebuild her life. Showing great determination, she did.

As ever, thank you for your interest and support.

Hannah xxx

For Authors

#1 for value with 565,000 readers, The Fussy Librarian has helped my books to reach #1 on 40 occasions.

A special offer from my publisher and the Fussy Librarian. https://authors.thefussylibrarian.com/?ref=goylake

Don’t forget to use the code goylake20 to claim your discount 🙂